NDLTD - Interoperability Metadata Standard for Electronic Theses and Dissertations
Interoperability Metadata Standard for Electronic Theses and Dissertations -- version .02
This version
http://www.ndltd.org/standards/metadata/draft-09-11-2000.html
Current version
http://www.ndltd.org/standards/metadata/current.html
Previous version
http://www.ndltd.org/standards/metadata/draft-07-09-2000.html
Editors
Anthony Atkins, Virginia Tech
Dr. Edward Fox, Virginia Tech
Outline
1. Introduction
2. Metadata Elements
2.1 dc.title
2.2 dc.creator
2.3 dc.publisher
2.4 dc.subject
2.5 dc.description
2.6 dc.contributor
2.7 dc.date
2.8 dc.type
2.9 dc.format
2.10 dc.identifier
2.11 dc.source
2.12 dc.language
2.13 dc.relation
2.14 dc.coverage
2.15 dc.rights
3.History
4.Contributors
1.Introduction
This document defines a standard set of metadata elements used to
describe an electronic thesis or dissertation.
Institutions dealing with electronic theses and dissertations
have all developed their own standards or adapted existing metadata standards.
These metadata standards all attempt to describe the author, the work, and the
context in which the work was produced in a way that will be useful to the
researcher as well as the librarians and/or technical staff maintaining
the work in its electronic form.
This document is not a replacement for the metadata schemes
developed for a particular university or environment. Rather, this document
should be used as a guideline to develop a faithful cross-walk
between local metadata standards and a single standard used for sharing information about ETDs.
2. Metadata Elements
The following is a description of the common
Dublin Core metadata elements, and which information
related to an ETD belongs in each field. If a more general element
(i.e. dc.creator) is described as mandatory, it should be specified
fully, even if qualified elements (i.e. dc.creator.given) are also specified.
If a more general element is repeatable, (i.e. dc.contributor) it should
be assumed that sub-elements (i.e. dc.contributor.family) are also repeatable.
| Element |
Description |
Mandatory? |
Repeatable? |
| dc.title |
title of the thesis or dissertation in source language
|
Y
|
|
| dc.title.alternative |
translated title of the thesis or dissertation
|
|
|
| Element |
Description |
Mandatory? |
Repeatable? |
| dc.creator |
Author(s) of the work
|
Y
|
|
| dc.creator.family |
Family name of the author.
|
|
|
| dc.creator.given |
Given name of the author.
|
|
|
| dc.creator.bday |
The author's birthday. Used to distinguish between authors with the same name.
|
|
|
| dc.creator.orgname |
The department(s) university(ies) the author is associated with.
This is typically the department and university granting the degree associated
with the work.
|
|
|
| dc.creator.email |
Email address most appropriate for contacting the author
|
|
|
| dc.creator.street |
Street or equivalent portion of the author's
postal address
|
|
|
| dc.creator.locality |
Locality (city, town, etc.) portion of the author's
postal address
|
|
|
| dc.creator.region |
Region (state, province, etc.) portion of the author's
postal address
|
|
|
| dc.creator.country |
Country portion of the author's postal address
|
|
|
| dc.creator.pcode |
Postal code (zip code, etc.) portion of the author's
postal address
|
|
|
| Element |
Description |
Mandatory? |
Repeatable? |
| dc.publisher |
Institution or organization responsible for publishing the
electronic thesis or dissertation
|
|
|
| dc.publisher.orgname |
Name of the organization or institution
|
|
|
| dc.publisher.email |
Email address most appropriate for contacting the organization or institution
|
|
|
| dc.publisher.street |
Street or equivalent portion of the organization or institution's
postal address
|
|
|
| dc.publisher.locality |
Locality (city, town, etc.) portion of the organization or institution's
postal address
|
|
|
| dc.publisher.region |
Region (state, province, etc.) portion of the organization or institution's
postal address
|
|
|
| dc.publisher.country |
Country portion of the publisher's postal address
|
|
|
| dc.publisher.pcode |
Postal code (zip code, etc.) portion of the organization or institution's
postal address
|
|
|
| Element |
Description |
Mandatory? |
Repeatable? |
| dc.subject |
Subject(s) or keyword(s) the work pertains to
|
Y
|
Y
|
| dc.subject.classification |
Description of the vocabulary or scheme used to determine the subject(s)
|
|
|
| Element |
Description |
Mandatory? |
Repeatable? |
| dc.description |
Abstract of the thesis or dissertation
|
|
|
| dc.description.notes |
Additional information regarding the thesis or dissertation.
Example: acceptance note of the department
|
|
|
| Element |
Description |
Mandatory? |
Repeatable? |
| dc.contributor |
Person(s) other than the author who contributed to the creation or
approval of the work. Typical use would be for advisors or committee
members.
|
|
Y
|
| dc.contributor.role |
Role the person played in the creation or approval of the work.
|
|
|
| dc.contributor.family |
Family name of the contributor.
|
|
|
| dc.contributor.given |
Given name of the contributor.
|
|
|
| dc.contributor.title |
Title (Dr., Dean, etc.) of the contributor.
|
|
|
| dc.contributor.orgname |
Typically the department and university the contributor is associated with.
May also contain the organization the contributor is associated with if the
contributor is not associated with a university.
|
|
|
| dc.contributor.email |
Email address most appropriately used to contact the contributor.
|
|
|
| dc.contributor.street |
Street or equivalent portion of the contributor's
postal address
|
|
|
| dc.contributor.locality |
Locality (city, town, etc.) portion of the contributor's
postal address
|
|
|
| dc.contributor.region |
Region (state, province, etc.) portion of the contributor's
postal address
|
|
|
| dc.contributor.country |
Country portion of the contributor's postal address
|
|
|
| dc.contributor.pcode |
Postal code (zip code, etc.) portion of the contributor's
postal address
|
|
|
| Element |
Description |
Mandatory? |
Repeatable? |
| dc.date |
Date most commonly associated with the work.
|
Y
|
|
| dc.date.created |
Date the finished version of the work was created.
|
|
|
| dc.date.valid |
Date the work was considered to be "valid" by the institution
granting the degree associated with the work.
|
|
|
| dc.date.available |
Date the work was made available to the public.
|
|
|
| dc.date.issued |
Date the work was added to the local electronic repository of
electronic theses and dissertations.
|
|
|
| dc.date.modified |
Date the work was changed.
|
|
|
| Element |
Description |
Mandatory? |
Repeatable? |
| dc.type |
Type of document. This is used to indicate the level of education this work is associated with.
|
Y
|
|
| dc.type.degree |
The degree the author of this work received in relation to this work. |
|
|
| Element |
Description |
Mandatory? |
Repeatable? |
| dc.format |
Description of the electronic format(s) in which the work is stored and/or
delivered
|
|
Y
|
| Element |
Description |
Mandatory? |
Repeatable? |
| dc.identifier |
Unique identifier used to distinguish the work from any other electronic
thesis or dissertation.
|
Y
|
|
| Element |
Description |
Mandatory? |
Repeatable? |
| dc.source |
Source materials or references from which the work was derived.
|
|
Y
|
| Element |
Description |
Mandatory? |
Repeatable? |
| dc.language |
Language(s) the full text of the work is written in.
|
|
Y
|
| Element |
Description |
Mandatory? |
Repeatable? |
| dc.relation |
Reference to a related work, including a sub-part of the work. It is important to note that in our concept, the work is treated as a whole, individual chapters or files are not handled separately.
|
|
Y
|
| dc.relation.isversionof |
|
|
|
| dc.relation.hasversion |
|
|
|
| dc.relation.isreplacedby |
|
|
|
| dc.relation.replaces |
|
|
|
| dc.relation.isrequiredby |
|
|
|
| dc.relation.requires |
|
|
|
| dc.relation.ispartof |
|
|
|
| dc.relation.haspart |
This field can be used to indicate the presence of separate files containing the full text, figures, or any supplemental media related to this ETD.
|
|
|
| dc.relation.isreferencedby |
|
|
|
| dc.relation.references |
|
|
|
| dc.relation.isformatof |
|
|
|
| dc.relation.hasformat |
|
|
|
| Element |
Description |
Mandatory? |
Repeatable? |
| dc.coverage |
Region in space or time with which the work is concerned.
|
|
|
| Element |
Description |
Mandatory? |
Repeatable? |
| dc.rights |
Copyright or availability information for this work. Typically, this
describes the conditions under which the work may be distributed,
reproduced, etc., how these conditions may change over time, and whom to
contact regarding the copyright of the work.
|
|
|
Sample Record
Here is a sample record from the Virginia Tech ETD collection, with information for the appropriate fields as described above.
For demonstration purposes, this information is encoded in a simplified XML form. The same information could be encoded in any structured format.
<dc.title>A Contemporary Turkish Coffeehouse Design Based on Historic Traditions</dc.title>
<dc.creator>Timur Oral</dc.creator>
<dc.publisher>Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University<dc.publisher>
<dc.subject>turkish</dc.subject>
<dc.subject>coffee</dc.subject>
<dc.subject>coffeehouse</dc.subject>
<dc.subject>tradition</dc.subject>
<dc.subject>culture</dc.subject>
<dc.subject>franchising</dc.subject>
<dc.subject>shop design</dc.subject>
<dc.description>
The custom of coffee drinking in Turkey dates back to the sixteenth century
coffeehouses of Istanbul, which were once important forums for community integration.
Even though coffee drinking today is still an important custom in Turkey, traditional
coffeehouses have lost their importance in urban areas and are rapidly being replaced
by contemporary cafes that promote European themes. With the new generation
placing less emphasis on traditional values and accepting a modernized lifestyle, the
existence of Turkish coffeehouse culture is struggling to survive.
The purpose of this thesis project was to develop a design concept for a
contemporary Turkish coffeehouse franchise retaining important aspects of the traditional
coffeehouses of the past. Historic features were identified through observations and
visual recordings of historic Turkish coffeehouses and interviews with older
patrons of traditional coffeehouses. Focus group discussions were held with graduate
and undergraduate Turkish students enrolled at Virginia Tech to obtain information on
their perceptions of traditional coffeehouses and responses to the idea of a
contemporary coffeehouse.
Based on the information gathered, design criteria were established for the design of
individual coffeehouse components with a consistent image, adaptable to various sites and
spaces. Coffeehouse logo, nameplate, and facade designs were proposed. Presentations for
the design included detailed elevations, plans, sketches, and perspective views.
</dc.description>
<dc.contributor role="Committee Chair">Jeanette Bowker</dc.contributor>
<dc.contributor role="Committee Member">Eric Wiedegreen</dc.contributor>
<dc.contributor role="Committee Member">Muzaffer Uysal</dc.contributor>
<dc.date>April 16, 1997</dc.date>
<dc.type>Master's Thesis</dc.type>
<dc.format>application/pdf</dc.format>
<dc.format>application/quicktime</dc.format>
<dc.identifier>etd-2227102539751141</dc.identifier>
<dc.language>english</dc.language>
<dc.rights>This work can be viewed or printed without restrictions. The author retains all other copyrights.</dc.rights>
In the example above, note that for the most part qualifiers are not used.
It is possible to specify the metadata in much greater detail, but the example given above shows how simple it is to provide enough
information for interoperability.
Document History
This document is based primarly on
the Dublin Core Metadata Initiative and the
proposed set of qualifiers put forward by the
DC Date Working Group.
Like the Dublin Core, the standard proposed by
this document does not require that these metadata elements
be implemented in any particular encoding scheme.
This document is also a distillation of the discussions which took place at
the workshop "DTDs and the usage of new XML-technologies for electronic theses and dissertations"
held in May of 2000 at Humboldt University in Berlin. A list of the participants is included in the contributors section.
More information regarding this workshop can be found at:
http://dochost.rz.hu-berlin.de/epdiss/dtd-workshop/.
This document is also based in part on a prior document entitled "NDLTD Metadata" drafted by Gail McMillan and Paul Mather.
Contributors
The following individuals and groups contributed to this document:
The following people participated in the metadata discussion led by Nuno Freire and Thorsten Bahne, which was part of the workshop "DTDs and the usage of new XML-technologies for electronic theses and dissertations" held at Humboldt University in Berlin in May of 2000:
- Per Åkerlund, SLU (Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences) Libraries, SWEDEN, Per.Akerlund@bibul.slu.se
- Anthony Atkins, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, University Libraries, USA, anthony.atkins@vt.edu
- Thorsten Bahne, Mathematics, University of Duisburg, Dissertation Online Project, GERMANY, bahne@,math.uni-duisburg.de
- Viviane Bouletreau, Sentiers, Université Lumiére, Lyon 2, FRANCE vboletr@univ-lyon2.fr
- Wolfgang Coy, School of Informatics, Humboldt-University Berlin, GERMANY, coy@informatik.hu-berlin.de
- Peter Diepold, Humboldt-University Berlin, School of Educational Science, GERMANY, diepold@educat.hu-berlin.de
- Susanne Dobratz, Humboldt-University Berlin, Computing Center, GERMANY dobratz@rz.hu-berlin.de
- Havard Fosseng, University of Oslo, Center for Information technology Services, NORWAY, havard.fosseng@usit.uio.no
- Nuno Freire, National Library Portugal, PORTIGAL, nuno.freire@ext.bn.pt
- Martin Hess, Informatik Uni Frankfurt: GERMANY hess@tm.informatik.uni-frankfurt.de
- Uwe Müller, Humboldt-University Berlin, Computing Center GERMANY u.mueller@rz.hu-berlin.de
- Phil Potter, University of Iowa, Academic Technologies (part of Information Technology Services), USA phil-potter@uiowa.edu
- Sebastian Rahtz, TeX User Group, UK; sebastian.rahtz@computing-services.oxford.ac.uk
- Paul W. Schaffner, University of Michigan at Ann Arbor, Library, USA, pfs@umich.edu
- Matthias Schulz, Humboldt-University Berlin, Computing Center, GERMANY matthias.schulz.1@rz.hu-berlin.de
- Peter Schirmbacher, Humboldt-University Berlin, Computing Center GERMANY schirmbacher@rz.hu-berlin.de
- Tuija Sonkkila, Helsinki University of Technology, Library, FINLAND sonkkila@cc.hut.fi
- Christof Steinbeck, Mack-Planck Institute of Chemical Ecology, Jena GERMANY, steinbeck@ice.mpg.de
- Kerstin Zimmermann, University of Oldenburg; Department of Physics; GERMANY; kerstin@merlin.physik.uni-oldenburg.de